Final month, San Francisco’s supervisors permitted a complete e-cig ban in a unanimous preliminary vote. “We spent the 90s battling large tobacco, and now we see its new type in e-cigarettes,” mentioned supervisor Shamann Walton. “That is about interested by the subsequent technology of customers and interested by defending the general well being and sending a message to the remainder of the state and the nation: comply with our lead,” added supervisor Ahsha Safaí.
There are a couple of months left earlier than the ban comes into impact and there’s at the very least one try to overturn it underway. Nonetheless if issues stay unchanged, the full e-cigarette ban will go into full impact in January subsequent 12 months.
Below the brand new laws, will probably be unlawful for any retailers in San Francisco to promote vaping merchandise, and for on-line distributors to ship them to addresses within the metropolis, till the time the FDA formally critiques the merchandise and grants them a Pre Market Tobacco Authorisation (PMTA). Within the meantime town’s residents must purchase their units and liquid, in neighbouring cities – or just return to smoking cigarettes, which sarcastically will stay on sale throughout town.
E-cigs are forbidden however cigarettes are okay
“So let’s get his reasoning straight. He’s saying that e-cigarettes shouldn’t even be in the marketplace, however cigarettes ought to! That is opposite to each public well being precept within the ebook.”
In response to this ban public well being consultants have voiced their issues about the truth that different cities and counties might comply with SF’s instance and this might spell catastrophe for public well being. “The San Francisco Metropolis Lawyer argued that e-cigarettes are ‘a product that shouldn’t even be in the marketplace’. So let’s get his reasoning straight. He’s saying that e-cigarettes shouldn’t even be in the marketplace, however cigarettes ought to! That is opposite to each public well being precept within the ebook,” mentioned public well being professional Dr. Michael Siegel.
“We goal to assist the general public make more healthy decisions. Forcing them to devour essentially the most lethal and poisonous shopper product in the marketplace is the very last thing on the planet that any coverage maker involved about public well being ought to be doing,” added Siegel.
The 2nd metropolis throughout the US and California to implement a ban
Subsequently as predicted, the East Bay metropolis of Livermore has adopted go well with and final week turned the second Californian metropolis after San Francisco, to ban the sale of e-cigarettes. The Livermore Metropolis Council unanimously permitted the invoice, which may also go into impact on the first of January 2020.
In the meantime, in contrast to the San Francisco ban, the Livermore laws solely bans the gross sales of e-cigarettes in brick-and-mortar shops, and the units will stay out there on the market on-line.
This laws additionally establishes a tobacco licensing program for retailers, prohibiting shops from promoting nicotine containing e-liquids, and bans all flavored tobacco merchandise, together with flavored cigarettes and cigars, with an exception for premium cigars. The Livermore invoice additionally bans the sale of any tobacco merchandise, like conventional cigarettes, inside 1,000 toes of areas typically frequented by youngsters, resembling faculties, libraries, parks, and day care facilities.
Learn Additional: San Francisco Chronicle
San Francisco’s Prime Economist Confirms E-Cig Ban Will Improve Smoking