Council Faces Initiative Which Could Legalize Illegal Marijuana Dispensaries, Conflicts with Present Ordinances


Here’s the complete report. an fascinating conundrum certainly.


Below California’s election laws, the Pasadena City Council only has two alternatives tonight when it comes to taking action on an initiative that would throw a wrench into the City’s complicated, voter-authorized industrial cannabis ordinances.

The Council can either vote the initiative into law or vote to spot it on the March 2020 ballot for residents to determine.

But, according to a city employees evaluation, the Council separately can also craft its personal measure for voters which would soften the initiative’s influence upon the present industrial cannabis method

“It would,” the report told the Council, “ be advisable to draft a measure that straight conflicts with the proposed measure.”

The newly certified proposed ballot measure would permit retailers who previously operated in violation of the Pasadena Municipal Code to temporarily continue operations without the need of going even though the present permitting method and without the need of possessing to comply with any of the City’s present distance specifications.

The measure would permit at least 18 far more cannabis retailers to operate in Pasadena legally, and at areas other than these authorized by the voters when Measure CC was passed.

The City’s Measure CC, authorized by the voters final year, at present restricts the quantity of cannabis retailers to six—one per Council district—and sets distance specifications from specific sensitive makes use of, such as properties, churches and schools.

No legal cannabis retail shops have officially opened however, but the proposed ballot initiative, if thriving, could considerably alter the City’s cannabis retailer landscape.

According to a City employees report, The proposed measure would permit formerly “illegal” operators to operate close to residential locations, parks and locations of worship, basically any zoning district in the City.

Shops would be regulated only by a State law, which is a 600-foot radius of a K-12, a day care center, or youth center.

Previously illegal operators could also move from their current areas and set up shop anyplace such retail is zoned.

New cannabis retailers who are at present in the licensing method would not be impacted by the proposed measure, and need to continue by means of the Measure CC licensing method.

Illegal operators would have to safe a neighborhood cannabis permit by January 1, 2025 by means of the neighborhood method, but would not have to go by means of the screening permit method, or the conditional use permit method, if they keep in their present areas.

Should really an illegal operator establish itself in a place just after the successful date of the proposed measure, and prior to establishment by a legal operator, according to the City’s employees report, the new legal operator would now have to situated 1,000 feet away from the illegal operator.

According to the employees report, all of the City’s cannabis operators are needed to have state license for cannabis or cannabis merchandise in accordance with the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Security Act and meet all of the specifications therein. The California Bureau of Cannabis Handle will handle the state licensing method.

Presently there are 18 illegal operators in the City that could advantage from the measure, 14 of which have been shut down by the City.

The City may perhaps also submit an cannabis initiative of its personal for the March ballot‚one that does not duplicate Measure CC, but as an alternative would straight conflict with the new measure. Should really each measures obtain adequate qualifying votes, the measure with the highest quantity of total votes would go in to impact.

In a associated improvement, the City Council will also vote Monday on whether or not or not to uphold the Board of Zoning Appeal’s choice denying SweetFlower Pasadena, LLC’s Conditional Use Permit application for cannabis retailers.

SweetFlowers’ permit application was ruled “incomplete” for the reason that it did not present a place map ready by a licensed surveyor, as needed by the City’s application method.


Latest posts