Hemp banking gets a enhance as 4 federal agencies get rid of red tape for new crop


Following a seasonlong struggle related with banking and financing their operations, hemp farmers and firms can exhale now that federal and state monetary institutions have loosened reporting restrictions on hemp banking and issued guidance to members.

The Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance coverage Corp., the Economic Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the Workplace of the Comptroller of the Currency as properly as the Conference of State Bank Supervisors filed a joint statement notifying banks that they are no longer expected to file suspicious activity reports (SARs) for shoppers who develop hemp in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

Banks are now anticipated to comply with normal procedures and file a SAR only when they think one particular is warranted.

Practically a year following the 2018 Farm Bill legalized hemp nationwide, the joint statement reminds monetary institutions of:

  • The legal status of hemp.
  • The U.S. Division of Agriculture’s interim final rule for hemp production.
  • Relevant needs for delivering solutions to hemp-connected firms.

In addition, the FinCEN stated it will concern more guidance to banks following reviewing and evaluating the USDA’s interim final rule.

Clarification delayed for months

This federal banking guidance comes seven months following Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon wrote to the 4 federal banking institutions imploring them to instruct their members to open up banking solutions to hemp farmers and firms and treat hemp as any other legal crop.

Even so, their letters did not lead to adjust in any U.S. Treasury Division guidelines about the paperwork involved in banking these firms.

“Today’s multiagency announcement represents continued progress as we perform to make sure hemp is treated just like any other legal agricultural commodity,” McConnell stated in a statement.

In June, the American Bankers Association (ABA) also wrote to the heads of these monetary regulatory agencies looking for extra clarification on how banks can serve hemp firms.

The bankers noted there had been small to no clear path on distinguishing among legal hemp and federally illegal marijuana.

According to the ABA letter, “Banks want to serve their communities and assistance their regional economies but need to have clear, unequivocal assurance that hemp is distinguishable from cannabis, and that serving the market will not expose them to criminal and civil liability, or regulatory censure.”

The bankers went on to ask for confirmation that hemp is no longer a controlled substance and that banks do not need to have to file SARs for hemp transactions.

Various more pleas have come from members of the U.S. Congress on behalf of constituent farmers and firms that lost banking solutions connected to expanding or promoting hemp.

The National Credit Union Association (NCUA), an independent federal agency that oversees and insures banking deposits for extra than 100 million U.S. account holders, reminded its member institutions in August that hemp firms are legal. The NCUA was not one particular of the institutions that received letters from the senators.

Business: Banks could need to have extra clarity

The federal guidance saying banks do not need to have to file SARs for hemp shoppers is welcome, but it may possibly not go far adequate to instill the level of self-assurance banks need to have, stated Washington DC-primarily based cannabis lawyer Jonathan Havens.

“I believe it is clear what the regulators are saying there, but statements like that may possibly give some banks pause,” Havens told Hemp Business Every day.

On the upside, Havens stated the guidance by federal regulators is useful to inform banks that may possibly have been apprehensive to go ahead and perform with providers that farm hemp or provide goods that comply with the definition of hemp beneath the Farm Bill.

But some banks may possibly really feel that if they cannot confidently inform the distinction among hemp and marijuana, it is not worth the danger, he added.

“The query becomes, in regulation is there a smooth pathway for banks to do this? And I believe the guidance these days aids, but it does not force banks to do some thing that they’re not comfy undertaking,” Havens stated.

“So you are nevertheless going to have holdbacks, but it just may possibly move the needle for some banks that are on the fence.”

Laura Drotleff can be reached at [email protected]

Subscribe to our Newsletter


Latest posts